Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-08-02 (12:39)
From: Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OcaML & UML
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 04:54:16 -0700 (PDT), Ed Keith wrote:
> A potential client requires that the system be
> documented in UML, but do not specify what language it
> will be implemented in. I have used UML to document
> C++ and Java, and know UML is supposed to be
> implementation language independent, but am concerned
> that the impedance mismatch with Ocaml may make it
> impractical to combine UML and Ocaml. Any thoughts?

Maybe you will find the following discussion useful:
<>.  As somebidy said:

  [...] you could use UML to model a system you plan to implement with
  FP: use class diagrams for modules, data members for data types and
  methods for functions.