[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-08-02 (12:39) |
From: | Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OcaML & UML |
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 04:54:16 -0700 (PDT), Ed Keith wrote: > > A potential client requires that the system be > documented in UML, but do not specify what language it > will be implemented in. I have used UML to document > C++ and Java, and know UML is supposed to be > implementation language independent, but am concerned > that the impedance mismatch with Ocaml may make it > impractical to combine UML and Ocaml. Any thoughts? Maybe you will find the following discussion useful: <http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1828>. As somebidy said: [...] you could use UML to model a system you plan to implement with FP: use class diagrams for modules, data members for data types and methods for functions. Cheers, ChriS