[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-08-04 (10:28) |
From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
Subject: | Str replacement |
When is the Str module going to be extended to provide re-entrant operations?? I understand (perhaps incorrectly) that Xavier rewrote the code for this module, and assume the underlying functionality is re-entrant? For compatibility the old broken interface is still available, which is fine, but a re-entrant interface should be provided. IMHO. It's disgusting, having a library like this in a functional programming language. Even Python gets this right. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net