Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
On bashing the OCaml-car...
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] On bashing the OCaml-car...
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 12:41 +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote:

> If you can remember the value ONE (one means: 1, type: int),
> then this is completely logical and very fine.
>   expr1; expr2; expr3
> are NOT ONE expression; they are a sequence of expressions.

Unfortunately no, this is indeed one expression.

John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: