Browse thread
On bashing the OCaml-car...
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] On bashing the OCaml-car... |
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 12:41 +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote: > If you can remember the value ONE (one means: 1, type: int), > then this is completely logical and very fine. > > expr1; expr2; expr3 > > are NOT ONE expression; they are a sequence of expressions. Unfortunately no, this is indeed one expression. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net