Browse thread
how to upset the ocaml type system....
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-08-28 (20:28) |
From: | Pietro Abate <Pietro.Abate@a...> |
Subject: | how to upset the ocaml type system.... |
hi all, the other day I was looking for a fringe case to show me the worst complexity of the type inference algorithm... I think I found what I was looking for: let x1 = fun x -> (x,x) in let x2 = fun y -> x1 ( x1 y ) in let x3 = fun y -> x2 ( x2 y ) in let x4 = fun y -> x3 ( x3 y ) in let x5 = fun y -> x4 ( x4 y ) in let x6 = fun y -> x5 ( x5 y ) in let x7 = fun y -> x6 ( x6 y ) in x7 ( fun z -> z ) ;; are there any other examples that exhibit worst-case complexity ? pietro ps: the example is from the paper "polymorphic unification and ML typing" from kannellakis -- ++ Blog: http://blog.rsise.anu.edu.au/?q=pietro ++ ++ "All great truths begin as blasphemies." -George Bernard Shaw ++ Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html