Browse thread
Sorted list
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jacques GARRIGUE <garrigue@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Sorted list |
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> > Distributing modifications to the compiler in the form of patches is > a bit of a PITA. Why? Please remember that you can still distribute binary versions of the modified software, so the constraint is just there to ensure that source versions include the full original sources, together with the modifications. A number of years ago I was doing it for olabl, and this was not a big problem (the license was even more restrictive then.) No, the real problem is that forking is difficult to justify if you provide only punctual improvements. So you still want the modifications to go into the trunk, not in a specific forked version... Jacques Garrigue