Browse thread
Question on polymorphic typing for curried functions
-
Christopher Kauffman
- Jon Harrop
- Julien Moutinho
- Harrison, John R
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Harrison, John R <john.r.harrison@i...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Question on polymorphic typing for curried functions |
Hi Chris, | I am looking for a bit of information on the behavior of | curried functions wrt polymorphic arguments. For instance, in | the following example, using a curried function seems to lose | the nice polymorphism that I desire. OCaml uses a variant of the so-called "value restriction" to ensure soundness in the way polymorphism and imperative features interact. You can find more information in this paper by Jacques Garrigue: http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~garrigue/papers/morepoly-long.pdf It can sometimes be annoying and unintuitive (for me anyway) to lose polymorphism by eta contraction. But this approach is at least relatively simple and well-understood. John.