Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Sorted list
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Sorted list
Richard Jones wrote:

> Again, I'm not suggesting that we fork OCaml.

I am suggesting that it should only be done for experiments of
a large and intrusive nature (ie experiments of a JoCaml size
or larger).

Forking for incremental language improvements would indeed be

Erik de Castro Lopo
"C++ is like jamming a helicopter inside a Miata and expecting
some sort of improvement." -- Drew Olbrich