Richard Jones wrote:

> Again, I'm not suggesting that we fork OCaml.

I am suggesting that it should only be done for experiments of
a large and intrusive nature (ie experiments of a JoCaml size
or larger).

Forking for incremental language improvements would indeed be
silly.

Erik
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"C++ is like jamming a helicopter inside a Miata and expecting
some sort of improvement." -- Drew Olbrich