Browse thread
undefined symbol `caml_tuplify2' in dynamic rocaml extension
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-08-02 (18:58) |
From: | Jos Backus <jos@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] undefined symbol `caml_tuplify2' in dynamic rocaml extension (UPDATE) |
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:20:50AM +0200, Mauricio Fernandez wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:24:05PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:59:07AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: [snip] > > Some good news. We got this to work by creating a kpp.ml file (containing the > > Callback.register calls) in the extension directory, and adding some values to > > CAML_LIBS, CAML_OBJS and CAML_INCLUDES. Yay! > > Yes, I wrote a very long message telling you exactly this (that you needed to > use CAML_LIBS so that -output-obj could work correctly) late at night but > forgot to send it :) Heh. All's well that ends well. > > Btw, besides having to remove the stray `"' we also found that we had to patch > > the kpp_rocaml_wrapper.c to make it compile, basically doing a `%s/t_value > > /t_value_/g' in this case. > > Chris Waterson has kindly sent me a patch fixing the problems you saw; I've > just pushed it to the online repository, along with an example of the above > TUPLE(LIST(t)) in examples/variants. Yeah, I dragged Chris into working on this yesterday (thanks Chris!) and he beat me to the patch :) > I'll work on the INCFLAGS issue so there's no need to hand-edit the > generated Makefile/wrappers. That would be nice. While you're at it, can you add LOCAL_LIBS, too? Those were the only variables we needed to change in the Makefile. > -- Mauricio Fernandez - http://eigenclass.org Thanks again Mauricio. -- Jos Backus jos at catnook.com