Browse thread
"opening" record types
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-08-22 (18:06) |
From: | Philippe Wang <lists@p...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] "opening" record types |
Yet another suggestion : Instead of : # module M = struct type t = { a : int ; b : int } end ;; module M : sig type t = { a : int; b : int; } end Write : # module M = struct type t = { a : int ; b : int } module N = struct type t = M.t = { a : int ; b : int } end end ;; module M : sig type t = { a : int; b : int; } module N : sig type t = M.t = { a : int; b : int; } end end Then : # include M.N;; type t = M.t = { a : int; b : int; } So that you can do : # { a = 42 ; b = 23 } ;; - : t = {a = 42; b = 23} That way, when you change or add definitions, it's easy to spread changes, and you export only what you want to export... :-) Cheers, -- Philippe Wang mail[at]philippewang.info Yitzhak Mandelbaum wrote: > Hi, > > I'm generally averse to opening modules, as I find it can make it hard > to figure out where definitions are coming from. Instead, I prefer to > bind only those pieces of the module that I need, and to do so > explicitly. However, there is one instance in which I find myself > with little choice: record types. In order to bind the > field-constructors for a record, you need to copy the entire type from > the module in which its declared. For example, > > module Foo = > struct > type t = {a: int; b:int} > end > > without copying the type: > > let y = {Foo.a=3; Foo.b=4} > > with copying: > > type t = Foo.t = {a: int; b:int} > > let x = {a=3; b=4} > > While this is a nuisance to begin with, its even worse if the record > type is subject to change -- each time it changes, you need to update > every place where you copied the definition. > > Is there any way around this? That is, is there any way to use the > field names of a record defined in another module without opening the > whole module or copying the whole definition of the record. > > Cheers, > Yitzhak > > -------------------------------------------------- > Yitzhak Mandelbaum > AT&T Labs - Research > > http://www.research.att.com/~yitzhak > <http://www.research.att.com/%7Eyitzhak> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >