Browse thread
Equivalent of Quotation.ExStr in new camlp4?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Harrison, John R <john.r.harrison@i...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Equivalent of Quotation.ExStr in new camlp4? |
Thanks; unfortunately in the gap between your two messages I really needed to get my code running, so I just took the path of least resistance and switched to camlp5. But I'll re-examine this in the future when I have more time. John. -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pouillard [mailto:nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 11:31 AM To: Harrison, John R Cc: O'Caml Mailing List Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Equivalent of Quotation.ExStr in new camlp4? Sorry, I used ocamlbuild to use this example and show it without ;( I forgot -I +camlp4/Camlp4Parsers Excerpts from Harrison, John R's message of Thu Jul 26 18:49:19 +0200 2007: > Trying your example in 3.10.0, I get the following: > > | $ ocamlc -pp camlp4of -I +camlp4 -c ex_str.ml > | File "ex_str.ml", line 2, characters 2-24: > | Unbound module Camlp4OCamlParser.Make > > I get a similar error in the toplevel even after #load "camlp4o.cma". > Do I need to load and/or open something else? > > John. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicolas Pouillard [mailto:nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 1:44 AM > To: Harrison, John R > Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Equivalent of Quotation.ExStr in new camlp4? > > On 7/25/07, Harrison, John R <john.r.harrison@intel.com> wrote: > > | No ExStr is no more supported. But you can do it your self by > calling > > | the parser on your string if you really don't want switch to an AST > > | based quotation expander. > > > > OK, that's fine. But how do I do that? Concretely, this is what I had > > before, so what should I have now? > > > > Quotation.add "" (Quotation.ExStr (fun x -> quotexpander));; > > > > I don't mind in principle writing an AST-producing expander, but at > the > > moment the priority is to get my code working in 3.10 with minimal > > expenditure of effort. > > > > You can instanciate an OCaml parser that way: > > $ cat ex_str.mlmodule Caml = > Camlp4OCamlParser.Make > (Camlp4OCamlRevisedParser.Make > (Camlp4.OCamlInitSyntax.Make(Ast)(Gram)(Quotation)));; > > let quotexpander str = > "[1; 2; 3]" (* ... do some real code on str *) > > let patt_quotexpander loc _loc_name_opt str = > Gram.parse_string Caml.patt loc (quotexpander str) > > let expr_quotexpander loc _loc_name_opt str = > Gram.parse_string Caml.expr loc (quotexpander str) > > let str_item_quotexpander loc loc_name_opt str = > <:str_item@loc< $exp: expr_quotexpander loc loc_name_opt str$ >> > > let () = > Syntax.Quotation.add "" Syntax.Quotation.DynAst.expr_tag > expr_quotexpander; > Syntax.Quotation.add "" Syntax.Quotation.DynAst.str_item_tag > str_item_quotexpander; > Syntax.Quotation.add "" Syntax.Quotation.DynAst.patt_tag > patt_quotexpander > > $ ocamlc -pp camlp4of -I +camlp4 -c ex_str.ml > $ camlp4o ./ex_str.cmo -str '<<>>;;' > > HTH > > -- > Nicolas Pouillard -- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai