Browse thread
Sorted list
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Sorted list |
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:42:21AM +1000, skaller wrote: > On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 11:09 -0400, Brian Hurt wrote: > > > Unortunately, the standard Ocaml solution in a situation like this is to > > implement your own data structure. The good news is that this is easy. > > The bad news is that, because this is easy, there is little pressure on > > the maintainers of Ocaml to add features to the core library. > > Well, I would like to see a community process for selecting, > implementing, documenting and maintaining a set of good algorithms > which go IN THE STANDARD DISTRIBUTION (under the usual LGPL+X licence, > with a disclaimer the code base isn't maintained by Inria, merely > distributed on behalf of the community). But what's wrong with extlib? Now I know it's not the "Standard" distribution, but that's a mere packaging issue. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat