Browse thread
If OCaml were a car
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Oliver Bandel <oliver@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] If OCaml were a car |
Zitat von Nathaniel Gray <n8gray@gmail.com>: > On 8/21/07, Luca de Alfaro <luca@dealfaro.org> wrote: > > The only thing about Ocaml I mind, is that it a bit like German is, in that > > all the verbs at the end come. And there nothing wrong is, but it for some > > strange reading makes, and it strange is that this from France comes. > > > > I still somewhat puzzled am, at reading: > > > > let f x = > > [humonguous definition 50 lines spanning] > > in List.iter f l > > > > because the only way I make sense of this can, is by first looking at where > > f used is, and only then reading its definition. > > I much rather write would: > > > > do List.iter f l > > where f x = [humonguous definition] > > Given the prevalence of List.fold and friends, I think this (the order > of arguments) is the biggest obstacle to code comprehension in OCaml. [...] I think that is the joke with wrong sided controls of the car?! ;-) Ciao, Oliver