Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: Ocaml for Scientific computing
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ocaml for Scientific computing
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 21:38 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:

> I'm not sure that it is conceptually more difficult to do similar things for 
> OCaml but my vote goes to hoisting bounds checks. I don't like having to 
> write unsafe code by hand in OCaml and F# does a great job of improving 
> performance by hoisting bounds checks.

I guess that this is easier. How much speed is gained eliding
bounds checks?

John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: