Browse thread
[ANN] coThreads 0.10
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: readline license (was: [ANN] coThreads 0.10) |
>>>Another *famous* example is 'readline()', the code that >>>does line editing for bash. Why is Ocaml's top level >>>so crappy, with no editing? Because of readline()'s GPL >> >>Surely that's not a good reason anymore; there are non-GPL >>workalikes to readline(). > > > Well one might ask Inria why they don't use it? (Just an aside: please say "the Caml development team" rather than "Inria", these are two different things.) So, yes, readline being GPL is a serious obstacle to using it within the OCaml toplevel. More details in this old thread: http://groups.google.com/group/fa.caml/browse_thread/thread/e7266ab6e6df91e7/e5ce04a21c80cac0 This said, rlwrap works pretty well and I don't see many advantages to linking directly with readline. - Xavier Leroy