Browse thread
Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-09-17 (16:35) |
From: | Fabrice Marchant <fabrice.marchant@o...> |
Subject: | Having '<<', why to use '|>' ? |
Hello ! For f1 and f2 composable functions, writing : let ( << ) f g x = f (g x) let g1 = f2 << f1 let ( |> ) x f = f x let g2 = fun x -> x |> f1 |> f2 I usually use '<<' and wonder if we can always supersede '|>' by this operator ? g1 and g2 are same functions ( not true ? ). Does it exists a case where the use of '|>' is better ? Thanks, Fabrice ----------------------------------- Force est de constater que mon post sur Lucky et Camel n'a pas fait un tabac...