English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-09-20 (13:40)
From: Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
>   It would be useful that experimented OCaml people suggest a replacement
for the heavily used composition operator ( << ) that is now reserved for

After reading all your posts and all previous posts I could find, I've
started using (<--) and (-->), but I also wish there was an agreed upon
notation for this. I have no confidence that my choices are good.