Browse thread
[ANN] coThreads 0.10
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] coThreads 0.10 |
skaller wrote: > Why don't you just use a different module name? I agree. Although it is nice the have the Cothreads API be so similar to the native Threads module, I can't possibly imagine ever wanting to go from Cothreads back to Threads. Erik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo ----------------------------------------------------------------- "That being done, all you have to do next is call free() slightly less often than malloc(). You may want to examine the Solaris system libraries for a particularly ambitious implementation of this technique." -- Eric O'Dell (comp.lang.dylan)