Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[ANN] coThreads 0.10
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] coThreads 0.10
skaller wrote:

> Why don't you just use a different module name?

I agree. Although it is nice the have the Cothreads API be so similar
to the native Threads module, I can't possibly imagine ever wanting
to go from Cothreads back to Threads.

Erik de Castro Lopo
"That being done, all you have to do next is call free() slightly
less often than malloc(). You may want to examine the Solaris
system libraries for a particularly ambitious implementation of
this technique."
-- Eric O'Dell (comp.lang.dylan)