Browse thread
Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ? |
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 17:42 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > If an OCaml front-end handled unicode with appropriate symbol settings then > you could use an "o" symbol to mean that infix operator. I think that is a > good solution, provided you use an editor that supports suitable unicode and > there is an easy way to enter such things. Actually no, I tried this. I used gvim and ignored the difficulty of entering the Unicode characters I wanted. The problem I found was that the fonts were such that the character was almost unreadable. And I think i tried, for example, the high school division sign.. If you tried that with a 'small o' it would just look like a small 'o' and not the composition operator. I think this problem might be fixed with lexical coloring though! -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net