Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
-
Aaron Bohannon
-
Nicolas Pouillard
- Daniel_Bünzli
-
Nicolas Pouillard
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-09-22 (15:42) |
From: | Daniel_Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@e...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ? |
Le 22 sept. 07 ŕ 17:22, Nicolas Pouillard a écrit : > The old and deprecated `&' operator do perfectly the job. > Indeed the OCaml > `&' operator have the associativity and a precedence close to the > Haskell `$' > than what can do the OCaml `$'. The problem is that jocaml recycles it. Daniel