Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
-
Aaron Bohannon
-
Nicolas Pouillard
-
Daniel_Bünzli
- Christian Stork
-
Daniel_Bünzli
-
Nicolas Pouillard
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christian Stork <caml-list@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ? |
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 05:43:54PM +0200, Daniel Bünzli wrote: > > Le 22 sept. 07 à 17:22, Nicolas Pouillard a écrit : > > >The old and deprecated `&' operator do perfectly the job. > >Indeed the OCaml > >`&' operator have the associativity and a precedence close to the > >Haskell `$' > >than what can do the OCaml `$'. > > The problem is that jocaml recycles it. Not only that, but why not strive for compatibility with F#'s operators? The F# developers thought this through and made reasonable choices, afaict. Indeed is there any reason why one couldn't come up with a camlp4 extension that emulates all of the operators that F# offers by default? -- Chris Stork <> Support eff.org! <> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~cstork/ OpenPGP fingerprint: B08B 602C C806 C492 D069 021E 41F3 8C8D 50F9 CA2F