Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: Ocaml for Scientific computing
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ocaml for Scientific computing
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Lin wrote:
> On Sep 25, 7:11 am, Alex Mikhalev <> wrote:

> For numerical computing, I wish ocamlopt would do at least basic loop
> optimizations, like hoisting invariant values -- this type of stuff is
> easily done manually, but often at the expense of code readability.

Gcc does this quite well I think. However in a higher level 
procedural language (like Ocaml and Felix) it is very hard
to get right and potentially very expensive.

John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: