[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ocaml for Scientific computing |
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Lin wrote: > On Sep 25, 7:11 am, Alex Mikhalev <a.mikha...@cranfield.ac.uk> wrote: > For numerical computing, I wish ocamlopt would do at least basic loop > optimizations, like hoisting invariant values -- this type of stuff is > easily done manually, but often at the expense of code readability. Gcc does this quite well I think. However in a higher level procedural language (like Ocaml and Felix) it is very hard to get right and potentially very expensive. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net