Browse thread
Bug in Filename.basename?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-09-05 (12:00) |
From: | Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Bug in Filename.basename? |
Oliver Bandel wrote: > But possibly it's not different to other basename-implementations. Which is exactly what I said later in my email. > Looking at that documentation, I can't see no bug in the implementation. Your documentation documents the Ocaml function. > When you want to know how your car's GPS-navigation system works, > do you look in the documentation of your video-camera or vacuum-cleaner? We are not talking about GPS systems or video cameras or vacuum cleaners, but if you want we can continue; I would be complaining if I was sold a video camera that didn't record video but did suck a lot of air. The function is called basename just like the IEEE Std 1003.1 standard function specified by The Open Group: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/basename.html In the examples section of that document they give these examples: Input String Output String "/usr/lib" "lib" "/usr/" "usr" Erik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Who would have believed that reading and writing would pay off?" -- Homer Simpson