Browse thread
Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Gabriel Kerneis <gabriel.kerneis@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ? |
Le Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:42:02 -0400, "Ashish Agarwal" <agarwal1975@gmail.com> a écrit : > > It would be useful that experimented OCaml people suggest a > > replacement > for the heavily used composition operator ( << ) that is now reserved > for camlp4... > > After reading all your posts and all previous posts I could find, I've > started using (<--) and (-->), but I also wish there was an agreed > upon notation for this. I have no confidence that my choices are good. <-- is already used in pa_monad (but it might not be a problem for you). Regards, -- Gabriel Kerneis