Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Gabriel Kerneis <gabriel.kerneis@e...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Having '<<', why to use '|>' ?
Le Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:42:02 -0400, "Ashish Agarwal"
<agarwal1975@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >   It would be useful that experimented OCaml people suggest a
> > replacement
> for the heavily used composition operator ( << ) that is now reserved
> for camlp4...
> 
> After reading all your posts and all previous posts I could find, I've
> started using (<--) and (-->), but I also wish there was an agreed
> upon notation for this. I have no confidence that my choices are good.

<-- is already used in pa_monad (but it might not be a problem for you).

Regards,
-- 
Gabriel Kerneis