Browse thread
Camlidl questions
-
Christopher L Conway
-
Daniel_Bünzli
-
Richard Jones
-
Chris Conway
- Richard Jones
-
Chris Conway
-
Richard Jones
-
Daniel_Bünzli
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Camlidl questions |
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 07:27:15PM -0400, Chris Conway wrote: > I'm afraid I don't understand this position at all. With a few dozen, > mostly obvious, annotations to the header files, I have covered 99% of the > library's functionality, automatically generating several thousand lines > of low-level boilerplate code. Leaving aside the possibility of known bugs > in Camlidl that might never get fixed... why would I want to code this all > by hand? Sorry, I was somehow confusing camlidl & SWIG. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat