Version franēaise
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Locally-polymorphic exceptions [was: folding over a file]
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Unsoundness is essential
A "sound program refuter" will not reject correct programs.

On 10/4/07, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> To be bold I propose type theorists have got it totally wrong.
>
> I want an unsound type system! It much better than the useless
> but 'sound' type system of Python, in which the type inference
> engine decides all values have type Object and proves
> in vacuuo that all programs are type-safe, only to do the
> dependent type checks at run time anyhow -- a cheat known
> as dynamic typing.