Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Smells like duck-typing
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@y...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Smells like duck-typing
> I think your solution is to fully use the "Objective" part of OCaml, 
> that is, using subtyping (technically it's polymorphic rows typing) :

Hi,

Yes, you're right.  Doing away with the inheritance -- while having the
disadvantage of forcing the redeclaration of all common fields -- does
allow me to throw away the ugliness of the option types.  It is in the
end the lesser of two evils...

Cheers,
Dario



      ___________________________________________________________ 
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good  http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html