Browse thread
Smells like duck-typing
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Smells like duck-typing |
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 10:45 -0400, Brian Hurt wrote: > I will note that Ocaml's row-level polymorphism allows you to invent new > supertypes of a given subtype as needed (a real nice feature, IMHO). > But what he's asking for is fundamentally nonsensical. No it isn't, its just mis-stated. What he actually wants is projections, which are perfectly sound. That is, given a concrete record with N fields, a collection of *views* which only expose a subset of the fields. More generally, not just a subset of fields, but a new record which is the image of a epimorphism (a structure preserving surjection or 'onto' mapping). -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net