Browse thread
A labltk book?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] A labltk book? |
> Probably. Its widgets are also much nicer looking, and apps written
> with it don't look jarringly out of place on a modern desktop the way
> Tk apps do. (All IMO, of course.)
Hi,
Still on the subject of toolkits, is there a reason why there aren't any
OCaml bindings for Qt? I mean, is it simply because no one ever bothered
to implement one, or are there license incompatibility issues?
I have used both Qt and Gtk before, and in my opinion, not only does
Qt's elegance give it an edge over Gtk, it also feels like it would be
a better match to OCaml.
Kind regards,
Dario Teixeira
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/