Version franēaise
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Locally-polymorphic exceptions [was: folding over a file]
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: rossberg@p...
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Unsoundness is essential
skaller wrote:
>
>> Exceptions are /trapped/ errors.
>
> I chose not to accept that definition. I use instead
> "trapped at compile time", meaning "in advance of running
> the program".

As a definition for what?

> Otherwise you could say dynamically typed languages were
> strongly typed and sound.

In fact, technically, they are. People have used the term "unityped" for it.

> C/C++ does this right: if a program is 'ill-formed' then
> a diagnostic must be issued. Throwing an exception silently
> is NOT allowed. [C/C++ doesn't mandate diagnostics always because
> some are too hard to detect]

This paragraph sounds like a contradiction in itself.

More importantly, an OCaml program performing div 0 isn't "ill-formed", it
has a perfectly well-defined, safe semantics (in precisely the same way as
adding a string in Python). See the library docs.

- Andreas