Browse thread
A labltk book?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Mattias EngdegÄ rd <mattias@v...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] A labltk book? |
>Even dumbed down C++ doesn't work well as a target language >due to a large number of 'non-orthogonalities' where some >of the few good invariants C provides are lost. Unfortunately >ISO C99 also trends that way for C as well. Would you mind elaborating? What non-orthogonalities in C++ and C did you have in mind?