Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Which syntax to teach ?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-10-30 (17:56)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Which syntax to teach ?

On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 12:08 -0500, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> Brian Hurt wrote:
> > Chung-chieh Shan wrote:
> > 
> >> Any tips on how (and perhaps how not) to teach functors? 

The problem teaching functors is that the essential feature
of functors is missing -- a functor is a structure preserving
map but there's no way to specify any structure other than
in comments.

John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: