Browse thread
Which syntax to teach ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Which syntax to teach ? |
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 12:08 -0500, Edgar Friendly wrote: > Brian Hurt wrote: > > Chung-chieh Shan wrote: > > > >> Any tips on how (and perhaps how not) to teach functors? The problem teaching functors is that the essential feature of functors is missing -- a functor is a structure preserving map but there's no way to specify any structure other than in comments. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net