Browse thread
Which syntax to teach ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chung-chieh Shan <ccshan@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: Which syntax to teach ? |
Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com> wrote in article <47275E10.4070705@janestcapital.com> in gmane.comp.lang.caml.inria: > Not sure how well this would work, but my idea would be to map the > concepts onto the standard code concepts. [...] I guess the issue then boils down to how to teach higher-kinded polymorphism, that is, functions that are polymorphic over a type *constructor*. It is crucial for me that the functor's argument module contain an abstract type *constructor*. -- Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig One can show you aren't immediately killed by tidal forces once crossing over the event horizon of Black Hole. Mathematically, your space coordinates become time-like and vice versa. This causes a shift in your light cone and your world line can never intersect with someone on the outside.