Browse thread
Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault....
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Till Varoquaux <till.varoquaux@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] STOP (was: Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault) |
> > > My impression was that bug reported via the mail ling list were > > acknowledged faster, I'm putting this theory to the test. > > You've just demonstrated out that this practice is very effective at > pissing me off. Are you satisfied? > > - Xavier Leroy I owe you a public apology: this was a very childish behavior. My aim was not to discredit the language nor the implementation. I feel blessed being able to use it in my day to day job and I think we all agree it is miles ahead of other "professional" languages and more practical than most pure research language. Triggering segfaults without resorting to unsafe techniques is very hard otherwise my previous post would have been pointless so I guess you could see this as a praise in disguise. Till