Browse thread
Smoke Vector Graphics: source code licenses for sale
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Edgar Friendly <thelema314@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Smoke Vector Graphics: source code licenses for sale |
Alexandre Pilkiewicz wrote: > Do you think it may be possible one day for OCaml to have a normalisation, > like Haskell had in 1998, and if it's allready the case, where can I find > it ? > I don't see the need for formalizing the OCaml language - If we tried to characterize what the current compiler did, we'd fail in many many details. And if we tried to write a spec independent of the compiler, all of a sudden we'd just introduce hundreds of bugs into the compiler because of its deviation from the spec. Formal specifications have use in strictly "research" languages, but I see their ability to stifle growth and improvement as more negative than their ability to help people understand the proper operation of OCaml. E.