[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Till Varoquaux <till.varoquaux@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] cost to let rec? |
On Nov 9, 2007 4:20 PM, Ralph Douglass <ralph@grayskies.net> wrote: > Is there any cost to defining a function with "let rec" instead of just > "let"? A slightly longer compile time or something? I'm just curious. Typechecking can indeed be longer, also reccursive functions are never inlined (and, AFAIK, the compiler considers all function defined via let rec as reccursive) > > -- > Ralph > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > Till -- http://till-varoquaux.blogspot.com/