Browse thread
Google trends
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Google trends |
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:00:24PM +1100, skaller wrote: > No they couldn't. The Cathedral would never let them. Ridiculous - they could have done a friendly fork of the code. Code could have been shared both ways between the OCaml-on-dot-Net and the OCaml-native compilers. They chose _not_ to do that. Anyway, I hope that people considering F# keep in mind what happens should Microsoft lose interest in it and decide not to continue supplying or supporting it. It's crazy to choose a language for any non-trivial program unless that language is either standardised with multiple independent vendors, or (better still) open source so you have options if your supplier stops supporting it. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat