Browse thread
ocamlbuild bug and questions Was: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlbuild: using *.itarget with flags
-
viktor tron
-
viktor tron
- Nicolas Pouillard
-
viktor tron
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: ocamlbuild bug and questions Was: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlbuild: using *.itarget with flags |
Excerpts from viktor.tron.ml's message of Thu Nov 22 17:36:14 +0100 2007:
> On 21/11/2007, Nicolas Pouillard < nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from hmf's message of Wed Nov 21 12:30:28 +0100 2007:
> > > The manual states that in the *.itarget
> > > files a comment is either a blank or dash.
> > > Does this mean:
> > >
> > > - comment here
> > >
> > > is a comment? If so, it does not seem
> > > to work.
> >
> > The manual is wrong on that point, it's a sharp (#) not a dash (-).
> >
> > # comment here
> >
>
> I also noticed that. Plus what seems to be a couple of bugs?
>
> $ echo -n '# comment here' > _tags
> $ ocamlbuild target
> Lexical analysis error: Bad key in configuration line at line 1 (from file:
> "_tags")
Yes your right, comments should end by a new line (I fix that).
> or even worse
>
> $ echo -n '# comment here:' > _tags
> $ ocamlbuild target
> Failure: lexing: empty token.
Yes that's the same one.
> Also: I had a number of question concerning ocamlbuild in my recent post
> about c libs from ocaml.
> I elaborate them here, but see my original post for the context.
> Does anyone have an illuminating insight?
>
> ---
>
> * I still don't know the most basic thing, how to build an output-obj o
> file.
That's not "the most basic thing" for the average OCaml programmer I think.
Ocamlbuild don't have such a rule by default (I think it will). However
define your own custom rule is really feasible.
(* something like that, but I've not tested *)
rule "the rule name"
~deps:["foo.cmo"; "libbar.a"(*...*)]
~prods:["obj.o"(*...*)]
begin fun _ _ ->
Cmd(S[V"OCAMLC"; A"-output-obj"; A"-o"; Px"obj.o"; P"foo.cmo"; P"libbar.a"(*...*)])
end;
> * I found no way to convince ocamlbuild to use the local library (in this
> example we build
> ocamlbuild foo.cmxa
> and then would simply want
> ocamlopt -o foo foo.cmxa foo_wrapper.ml
> but 'ocamlbuild foo_wrapper.native' rebuilds it all the same
in the myocamlbuild.ml you have to declare the library:
ocaml_lib "foo"
and in the _tags file:
"foo_wrapper.native": use_foo
> * I don't know what the possible tags are, how I add them.
They are implicitly declared, for instance if you add:
flag ["ocaml"; "link"; "byte"; "mytag"] (S[A"-cclib"; A"mycopt"]);
You can then tag some .byte files with mytag, -cclib mycopt flags will be
added at link time.
> * If I use a syntax extension which has to be build, adding the pp... tag
> does not create a dependency which is checked. I don't know how to add this
> dependency.
Use a dep declaration with same tags and then files that needs to be built.
dep ["ocaml"; "pp"; ...] ["myextension.cmo"]
> Help appreciated, but probably a more detailed manual will solve
> this with time.
The wiki [1] talk about using syntax extension.
[1]: http://brion.inria.fr/gallium/index.php/A_plugin_for_camlp4_syntax_extension_%28pa_openin%29
--
Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai