Ok, it's 3.10.0

When I did ./configure -host powerpc-ydl-linux the resulting report seemed
to suggest that it was going to build native 32-bit, but native tools like
ocamlopt were not present post-build.

At this point I'm too inexperienced to unravel the mysteries behind the
less-than-ideal result.


Richard Jones-4 wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:32:34AM -0800, Mike Hogan wrote:
>> I have recently compiled OCaml 3.10 for the PS3 running Yellow Dog Linux. 
>> Seems to work fine, but I haven't tested it rigorously (and at this
>> point, I
>> wouldn't even know how to test it ... um ...what's the opposite of
>> "rigorously"? ... non-rigorously?)
> 
> Native compiler?  64 bits??  Which version of OCaml???
> 
> Rich.
> 
> -- 
> Richard Jones
> Red Hat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/More-registers-in-modern-day-CPUs-tf4389938.html#a13907602
Sent from the Caml Discuss2 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.