[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Andrej Bauer <Andrej.Bauer@f...> |
| Subject: | Local references in Ocaml vs. state in Haskell |
I have some programs written in ocaml that use references. I wanted to
translate them to Haskell, but since I am not an active Haskell user, I
got stuck with a very simple problem, namely, that the state monad in
Haskell provides _global_ references while ocaml has _local_ references.
Suppose in ocaml I have this:
(* Does a functional [f] look at its argument [a]? *)
let touched f a =
let flag = ref false in
let _ = f (fun n -> flag := true; a n) in
!flag
"touched f a" evaluates "f a" and records the fact that f actually
evaluated a at some argument. Note that flag is a local reference, so f
does not have access to it.
Using a global flag does not work:
let flag = ref false
let touched' f a =
flag := false ;
let _ = f (fun n -> flag := true; a n) in
!flag
Now we can write an f which touches its argument but fools touched' by
reversing the value of flag.
let f a =
let y = a 42 in
touched := false ; y
If I try to use the State monad I will get a global reference threaded
thrugh the computation, and f will have access to it. I want a local
reference that is inaccessible outside its lexical scope. I am probably
missing something obvious about Haskell.
I am hoping that even though this is a question about Haskell, you won't
mind, as it gives everyone on this list an opportunity to show how ocaml
is superior to Haskell. Just kidding :-)
Andrej