Browse thread
Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault....
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature request (was Re: [Caml-list] Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault....) |
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Martin Jambon wrote: > I think that the standard library should provide a Pervasives.segfault > function. Of course, this is a joke. I don't want to advertise against OCaml since I'm making a living out of it like many of us on this list. The meaning is really that in OCaml it is simply impossible to get segmentation faults. My joke was about suggesting a way of making it much easier for beginners to trigger segmentation faults because they may miss them sometimes if they are used to other inferior tools. Martin -- http://wink.com/profile/mjambon http://martin.jambon.free.fr