> May I suggest another name?
> There's already Caml light.
> In my opinion, having the name start with "ocaml" is a good idea (or 
> should even be mandatory for every ocaml-derived product).
> It should just be followed by something that is reasonably not ambiguous.

Hi,

On a similar vein, has anyone noticed that "OCaml" and "O'Caml" produce
different results in Google?  Could some (naïve) language popularity
statistics be skewed unfavourably towards Ocaml because of this? And
should we as a community stick to one nomenclature to avoid this problem?...

Cheers,
Dario Teixeira



      ___________________________________________________________ 
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good  http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html