Browse thread
Compiler feature - useful or not?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Compiler feature - useful or not? |
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> Martin Jambon wrote:
>> Please don't take my suggestions too seriously, but it could be cool to
>> define types such as:
>>
>> type bit = [ 0 | 1 ]
>>
>>
>> Martin
>
> How about this:
>
> type permission =
> User_read -> 0o400 | User_write -> 0o200 | User_execute -> 0o100
> | Group_read -> 0o40 | Group_write -> 0o20 | Group_execute -> 0o10
> | World_read -> 0o4 | World_write -> 0o2 | World_execute -> 0o1
>
> let combine (pl: permission list) =
> List.fold_left (fun a b -> a lor (b :> int)) 0 pl
I'm afraid of losing the following basic feature ("your first
OCaml program"):
# 0;;
- : int
and instead get:
# 0;;
- : [< int > 0 ]
Perhaps polymorphism should not be the default, i.e. we would have to use
a special keyword:
# poly 0;;
- : [< int > 0 ]
# 0;;
- : int
Martin
--
http://wink.com/profile/mjambon
http://martin.jambon.free.fr