[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christopher L Conway <cconway@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Which camlp variant? |
pa_log is compatible with camlp5. In fact, that's what I use. Just s/4/5/ all commands invoking camlp4. Regards Chris On Nov 7, 2007 1:25 PM, tmp123 <tmp123@menta.net> wrote: > Hello, > > The module "pa_log" proposed by Mr. Conway seems very near to the > objective of my previuos post. > > The objective now is expand a line like: DEBUG 3 "%d\n" 14 > to: if debug.val then logint 3 ( fun () -> Printf.printf "%d\" 14 ) > else (); > > However, it is necessary to migrate the module to new camlpx . > > Please, could someone give any advice about the current options: camlp4 > or camlp5? PreCast? Functorial? > > Thanks a lot. > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > >