Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Which camlp variant?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Christopher L Conway <cconway@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Which camlp variant?
pa_log is compatible with camlp5. In fact, that's what I use. Just
s/4/5/ all commands invoking camlp4.

Regards
Chris

On Nov 7, 2007 1:25 PM, tmp123 <tmp123@menta.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The module "pa_log" proposed by Mr. Conway seems very near to the
> objective of my previuos post.
>
> The objective  now is expand a line like: DEBUG 3 "%d\n" 14
> to: if debug.val then logint 3 ( fun () -> Printf.printf "%d\" 14  )
> else ();
>
> However, it is necessary to migrate the module to new camlpx .
>
> Please, could someone give any advice about the current options: camlp4
> or camlp5? PreCast? Functorial?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
>