[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 optional arguments |
Excerpts from SerP's message of Mon Dec 17 12:50:24 +0100 2007: > Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > > What preprocessor do you use revised syntax, original one? > > > > It seems to be a bug already fixed for the revised syntax, since it works for > > me. > > > > > Thanks, it's really works in revised syntax. If it works for you too in the revised syntax I can deduce that you were trying the original one ? > Should I post this bug? Yes, but it won't be a priority this it becomes a lot more ambiguous in original syntax. > What about a case when we use original syntax ? :-) Yes. -- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai