Version franēaise
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Questions on replacing finalizers and memory footprints
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Questions on replacing finalizers and memory footprints
Jean-Christophe Filliātre a écrit :
> Xavier Leroy wrote:
>>> Also, is there a simple way to implement a function (perhaps using
>>> Obj.magic) which will walk a (possibly circular) network of tuples,
>>> arrays, variadic entities and lists, and return the total number of
>>> bytes used up by that structure? I see that this should be possible
>>> in principle with the present implementation of the runtime if one
>>> could get some basic information about the internal type of an
>>> array.
>> Jean-Christophe Filliātre's "size" library does exactly this:
> Indeed. However, note that it uses internally a hash table to store
> blocks already considered (in order to correctly account for sharing),
> and thus it is potentially incorrect if the GC moves some blocks during
> the count, for instance during a resizing of the hash table (which
> triggers the GC). I don't know how to avoid this issue; any help is welcome.

Write size in C, marshaling is written with a hashtbl in C probably for 
that same reason ...