Browse thread
Class runtime representation
-
Dmitry Bely
- Till Varoquaux
-
Jacques Garrigue
-
Dmitry Bely
- Richard Jones
-
Dmitry Bely
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Class runtime representation |
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 05:00:41PM +0300, Dmitry Bely wrote: > Thanks for the detailed explanation. I don't like method names in the > binary because they show some implementation details that I would like > to hide; several extra bytes of code are really not a problem. I suppose you could preprocess the source to mangle method names, but to be honest if you're worried about the security of the binary from reverse engineering I'm afraid that you'll need to consider a lot more than just mangling. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat