Browse thread
MinGW port w/o Cygwin?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Kuba Ober <ober.14@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: Re : Re: [Caml-list] Re: MinGW port w/o Cygwin? |
On Sunday 23 December 2007, Adrien wrote: > 2007/12/20, Kuba Ober <ober.14@osu.edu>: > > I guess that Ocaml maintainers should just drop that Cygwin requirement, > > and tweak their build process to work "out of the box" with MSYS/MinGW. > > You shouldn't see cygwin as a _requirement_. > Ocaml installation from source (let the binary distributions be a > special case) use C. If there is no c compiler installed as it is > under all windows installations (I mean right after setup is > completed) ocaml simply can't be installed ; the problem is not with > ocaml or cygwin but with windows. Cygwin is not a fancy requirement > just one of the few ways to get a c compiler under windows. > > Also mingw without cygwin still lacks a lot of things. Capabilities > are there but it seems header files have not been updated in ages and > linker flags need to be different (you will often need -lws2_32 for > many C apps especially). THe right way is to update mingw headers, submit to the maintainers, and go from there. That's the OSS way. > Anyway, the result is a big headache for the developper. I perfectly > understand the ocaml team is not willing to make a complete mingw/msys > port ; it's such a mess. It's the only sane way to go. THere's no technical reason to require a unix environment to build ocaml. Big applications build on Windows just fine... > So there would be msvc, cygwin, cygwin/mingw, msys/mingw with > different configuration files for each. While such a port would be > easy to create it wouldn't be wise to create it imho ; it wouldn't > help maintaining and would create bugs along with more work for the > ocaml team. Supporting Cygwin at all is a waste IMHO. Either you run Unix or Windows, choose one and stick with it... > And then one could add a SFU port (Services For Unix) which lets you > compile ocaml without problem except that it works so well ocaml > thinks it is running under unix and uses forward-slashes as path > separators. (everything that ./configure can enable is enabled) IIRC Windows accepts forward slashes everywhere just fine. > compile with mingw just to remember last time I tried I spent two > hours. I then used sfu, cd'ed in the source directory, ./configure, > make, strip and within 90 seconds my rsync build was ready to > download. SFU is free though not free as in free speech, but when > you've spent hours on msys/mingw, you can accept anything and be > really happy with it. *) Well, all it means is that Ocaml wasn't designed to build on Windows, that's it. MSYS provides what reasonably can be provided without a Unix emulation layer. THe fact that Oaml uses a Unix-centric build system and whatnot makes things the way they are. The windows build could dispense with configure and whatnot. Cheers, Kuba