Browse thread
Ask for a more efficient way to deallocate memory (full version)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Yitzhak Mandelbaum <yitzhak@r...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Ask for a more efficient way to deallocate memory (full version) |
On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > > However, using any camlp4 macros requires using the camlp4 > replacement for the > front-end of the compiler. That uses a different parsing technology > (top-down > recursive descent LL rather than bottom-up LALR) so the error > messages from > the compiler are completely different. Just to clarify : the error messages from the *parser* are completely different. Everything after the parser is the same with or without camlp4. Most importantly, you don't have to learn new type-checker messages. Yitzhak -------------------------------------------------- Yitzhak Mandelbaum AT&T Labs - Research http://www.research.att.com/~yitzhak